Youth sports have shifted from a participation model (cheap, child-driven, fun) to a performance model (costly, adult-managed, early specialization). The result: an epidemic of overuse injuries and a widening have/have-not gap. Points to Norway's model — cheap, no scorekeeping/rankings, specialize late — as the opposite of the US.
"There is almost an insatiable demand for youth sports experiences. What exists today is a fraction of what we think the potential is."— a leading investor, quoted by Flanigan (March 2024)
Asks: register all youth-sports orgs with US Safe Sport; expand options in "sports-starved" areas; prohibit predatory practices; set coach safety/training standards.
His association's longtime home rink (Wings West) was acquired by Black Bear Sports Group (Oct 2025). He says negotiations turned "coercive and heavy-handed" — demands to change the name, logo, and programming, raise fees, and cut services — and KOHA was evicted in March 2026. Frames it as a broader pattern: acquire the facility, then force nonprofits to conform to a vertically integrated for-profit model or lose access.
"Within 30 seconds of meeting [the operator], he had unraveled 60 years of KOHA history — demanding we change our name, our logo, all of our programming… it was easy for us to be removed."— Kabec, describing the acquisition talks
The core critique. PE captures youth sports by rolling up competitors across many small deals, then vertically integrating to control the whole ecosystem. Examples cited: Varsity (cheerleading), Black Bear (hockey), 3Step Sports (said to hold ~70% of elite NJ soccer tournaments). Barriers created: cost, travel/logistics, and geography.
"We call this model a flywheel — trapping families inside and locking competitors out."— Van Dyck
Asks: ban vertical integration, state-of-play, and junk fees (the Let Kids Play Act); make the PE investors behind leagues liable for debts and safety violations; trigger merger reporting on the cumulative effect of serial small acquisitions; fund youth sports as a real national priority.
The "not all capital is the same" voice. Says responsible, mission-aligned investment expands access — 80%+ of his participants are in local rec/youth leagues, and he's funded thousands of scholarships. His public-private partnership model finds efficiencies in municipal operations and reinvests the savings into access. Neither defended nor attacked PE; argued the test is whether the mission stays centered on kids.
"The success of capital should be judged not by the returns it creates for investors, but by the opportunities it creates for children."
"We have to be profitable to be civic — but put the community first."— Finity
Tap any section to expand.
The critique (Van Dyck, and echoed by most Democrats): When one company owns the rink/field and the league and the teams and the tournaments, it can write the rules to favor its own teams, dictate which apparel families buy, decide who gets ice time, and mandate travel/hotels. That concentration is the harm — not private money itself. Because the "customers" are children and anxious parents (a vulnerable, captive population), the extraction is worse than in an ordinary market. She likened it to PE roll-ups in nursing homes, hospitals, and housing.
The three specific practices repeatedly named as the target:
The counterpoint (Finity, plus most Republicans and the two statements entered into the record): Capital is what lets small/rural communities renovate facilities and run free programs at all. The distinction that matters is responsible vs. extractive capital — investment that reinvests in the community and stays mission-aligned vs. investment built purely to maximize short-term return. Both sides explicitly agreed private capital has a legitimate role.
Antitrust reality Bonamici (D) and Bobby Scott (D, full-committee ranking member) pressed on enforcement. Van Dyck: existing antitrust law already reaches vertical monopolies, but enforcement is "anemic" — DOJ reportedly steering toward settlements over litigation and discouraging long investigations. Her structural fix: report acquisitions based on the cumulative effect of many small deals, so serial roll-ups get caught before they're locked in. State attorneys general were floated as a backstop if federal enforcement lags.
The scholarship "false promise" Bonamici (ex-FTC, regulated deceptive advertising) zeroed in on parents being sold on scholarship odds when only ~2% of HS athletes get one. Suggested both enforcement against deceptive claims and parent-education efforts.
Specialization & injuries Recurring across both parties. Early single-sport specialization drives ACL injuries, Tommy John surgeries, burnout. JJ Watt was quoted (via Van Dyck): "Specialization benefits the adults who profit at the expense of the child." Norway's late-specialization model held up as the ideal.
Travel & cost Travel is the single biggest family expense; ~80% of parents want less of it (Rep. Harris cited the USA Today poll). Localizing play was framed as the biggest available cost lever.
Public funding gap The USOPC gets most of its money from NBC broadcasts and spends under 1% on youth sports — and receives $0 federal funding despite decades of "national priority" rhetoric. Bobby Scott did the math: ~$100B/yr would fund school sports for ~50M students, framed against $4T in new debt.
Fear of retaliation Van Dyck said it's hard to even find parents willing to testify — they fear their kid gets cut from the team.
Pro-investment testimony (R side) Rep. Rulli (OH) highlighted Black Bear investing $1.2M+ in a Youngstown facility and running a free "Give Hockey a Shot" program — the strongest pro-private-capital framing of the day. Reps. Messmer (IN) and Moylan (Guam) emphasized responsible public-private partnerships for rural areas.
NIL pressure Rep. Owens (UT) raised how name/image/likeness deals reaching high-schoolers add pressure to invest early. Flanigan invoked the "commercialization effect" — market values crowding out teamwork, loyalty, and joy.
R framing "Bad actors" vs. responsible operators; preserve competitive pathways while protecting broad access; public-private partnerships as the tool. D framing Consolidation as a market-power problem like healthcare/housing; antitrust + public funding + (for some, e.g. Rep. Summer Lee) banning PE from the sector outright.
| Entity | How it came up |
|---|---|
| Black Bear Sports Group | The hearing's central case study — hockey-rink roll-up accused of predatory pressure on a nonprofit (critical). Also credited by Rep. Rulli for a $1.2M facility investment + free program (positive). |
| 3Step Sports | Cited as owning "thousands of leagues and tournaments," incl. ~70% of elite NJ soccer tournaments (example of concentration). |
| Varsity (cheer) | Held up as the archetype of a vertical monopoly — events + apparel + governing body — with cited safety/abuse scandals. |
| Ankored + RCX Sports | Named by Flanigan as examples of companies providing vital, beneficial services that expand access. |
| High Velocity Sports | Witness Finity's facility — the "responsible capital" model. |
| KOHA / Wings West | The evicted Kalamazoo nonprofit and its former home rink. |
| Tilly's Touch | Syracuse nonprofit (refugee youth) praised by Rep. Mannion as a community-first model. |
Referenced repeatedly as the vehicle. As described by witnesses/members, it would:
Rep. Summer Lee (D-PA) went furthest — describing the bill as prohibiting PE and "predatory for-profit companies" from investing in youth sports at all, and pushing to mark it up. Note: characterizations came from testimony, not the bill text; the exact statutory scope should be verified against the filed legislation before relying on it.
Read as a neutral signal of the regulatory/political climate:
(Framed as an industry-observer reading of public testimony — not investment advice.)
raw/web-clips/2026-06-30-congressional-hearing/). · This page is unlisted (not indexed).